NLRB Expands Test for Joint Employment

By
The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) announced in an August 27, 2015 decision that it was changing the test to determine whether two related businesses are "joint employers." In sum, the federal position announced in the NLRB decision is that many more businesses, like franchisors-franchisees, manufacturers-distributors, and staffing agencies and their clients can be held jointly liable for employment claims (wage and hour violations, discrimination and harassment, etc.) and could more easily organized by labor unions. This new legal test will be a major change for many businesses if it survives the expected court challenge. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

OSHA's Mandatory Vaccination Rule Stayed by Federal Court

By
On November 5, 2021, the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration published its anticipated emergency temporary standard on COVID-19 Vaccination and Testing (the “ETS”). Citing the “grave danger” posed by the virus to unvaccinated employees in the workplace, the headline-grabbing core of the ETS is the requirement that covered employers must implement and enforce a policy that mandates that employees be fully vaccinated against COVID-19 by January 4, 2022 or to submit to weekly COVID-19 testing and wear a mask.   The ETS stated that it was to take effect immediately, i.e ., when it was issued on November 5, 2021.   However, numerous legal challenges to the ETS were filed in federal courts across the country on the same day it was issued.   The challengers in the legal cases asserted, among other things, that the ETS is not valid because OSHA did not have the authority to issue the ETS and that it is unconstitutional. In one of those challenges, the ...
Read more

Governement Agency Scruntizes Confidentiality Agreements

By
The Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") recently announced that it had opened an enforcement action against a company based on a confidentiality agreement that the SEC claimed interfered with the rights of would-be whistleblowers.  According to the SEC, the confidentiality agreement was presented to employees during workplace investigations, and prohibited the employees from speaking about the investigation with anyone unless the company granted permission.  The SEC claimed that such a provision violated the whistleblower protections of Rule 21F-17 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which prohibits actions that impede whistleblowers from reporting possible securities law violations to the SEC.  Our colleague Morgan Curry has offered a solid analysis of the SEC's action here .  As a result, businesses are well advised to take a look at their confidentiality provisions, especially those in employment and severance agreements,...
Read more

Womble Hosts Local SHRM Chapter for Employment Law Update

By
Image
(Winston-Salem, NC)  For the eleventh year in a row, John Pueschel of Womble Bond Dickinson’s Winston-Salem office hosted the 2019 Legal Update for the Winston-Salem Chapter of the Society for Human Resource Management at the Firm’s Winston-Salem office. Over 50 HR professionals of clients and local businesses attended. The event provided information and best practices on legal issues of particular interests to HR professionals. Womble Bond Dickinson attorneys led many of these sessions, which included: Internal Investigations, led by Womble Bond Dickinson attorney Kurt Stakeman and J.T. Moser , Director of Enterprise Risk and Corporate Investigations at Wake Forest University Health Sciences; Womble Bond Dickinson attorney Gemma Saluta , who is a Board-certified workers’ compensation specialist, facilitated a Q&A session with Industrial Commission Deputy Commissioner Michael Silver ; EEOC Re quest for Collection of Pay Data, presented by Womble Bond Dickinson atto...
Read more